It doesn’t matter how to look at how human society should be arranged, whether public interests or personal interests should prevail in it, each person has his own point of view. But one thing is obvious how society cannot do without a person, so a person cannot do without society, collective survival is based on these principles. So no matter how we try to divide our and social interests, all that we can come to the model of social parasitism, in which there are simply people who only take, but do not give anything in return.
In principle, such people are always visible to the naked eye, and cause irritation among most members of society, because it is clear that you can’t build any society on social parasites at all, except that only totalitarian, but without them, too, the nature of man makes him look for benefit primarily for myself. Nevertheless, being members of society, we freely or involuntarily have to observe its interests, but this has our own price, namely personal interests, because for the sake of a million you can sacrifice thousands, and for the sake of hundreds of millions, respectively, sacrifice a million.
If you look at the world globally, then such actions fully justify themselves, only from the point of view of those who actually sacrifice, this is far from a rainbow prospect, to put your life for the sake of others. Although, of course, how to look at it, because many go to it consciously, sacrificing their lives for the sake of the life of others, sacrificing the real for the future. This one can be different in different ways, and here everyone makes their own here, because on the one hand we are all to one degree or another, and on the other, there should be at least some meaning in our lives, for ourselves, first of all.
A person has the right to dispose of his life at his discretion, and the most interesting thing is that we don’t know how to do it right, from that, and make our choice according to our beliefs, living for our pleasure or following some social idea. It is not the same and not the other cannot be called erroneous, simply because there is no standard and there is no landmark for each of us, we ourselves choose it, because we are actually free in our choice, which we always have.
And thus, if a person has made a choice in favor of public interests or any public idea, then you should not refer to injustice later, if his own interests are left unattended, everything is very fair in this case, because this is a matter of choice.
