The current legislation, unfortunately, does not solve the problem in any way – there is no clear explanation of how to act with such illegal buildings is not elementary. On the one hand, the seller is cunning, announcing that the building is not multi -apartment, but simply large “for one family”, in accordance with the apartments are identified not by separate residential premises, but as rooms. And by the law, to find fault here, as well as to demolish the house or completely eradicate such a phenomenon as the construction of “apartment buildings” on the lands used for personal development. On the other hand, opponents of such construction prove that the structure is illegal and its demolition is required, ordinary citizens suffer, who just wanted to have their own housing. At the moment, everything is decided within the borders of the lawsuit, with all this Yekaterinburg ministers of Themis, they remain on the side of people. However, it is obvious that this problem must be resolved only at the legislative level – the deputies must accept the regulatory document, which would provide for the “legalization” of such housing or establish a complete ban on the construction of such houses.
So, at present, at the level in SNiPs, such a thing as a “low -apartment building” is not at all, although it is clear that the structures outlined above could be ranked precisely for a similar category. In particular, residents of such a building will consume mainly more than the owners of the usual cottage “for one friendly family”, but many times less than the population of a large apartment building, say, 75 apartments. Recall that one of the reasons why such buildings, for example, in Yekaterinburg, are required to remove is the planned overload of communications, which are not “inscribed” into the project of this house. Accordingly, the inclusion in the laws of the latest category of houses made it possible to register obligations for the developer.
Another way to solve the problem, however, is not in favor of developers is to connect the control of state building supervision over such objects, including also on the fact of commissioning (there is currently no need for it). In addition, if the leadership published information about the lands allocated for personal construction, the potential owner of the apartment could directly make sure which site his house is being created on and protect himself from a dubious deal.
